Thursday, April 2, 2009

US to go further than Rudd over emissions

Adam Morton and Anne Davies 
The Age, April 2, 2009

PROPOSED US climate change laws aim for much deeper cuts in greenhouse emissions than promised by the Rudd Government, reigniting calls for Australia to adopt tougher targets.

Draft legislation released by the powerful US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee proposes a cap-and-trade scheme leading to cuts equivalent to 30 per cent below 2005 levels by 2020.

The Australian Government proposes cuts of between 5 and 15 per cent below 2000 levels, depending on the level of international co-operation to tackle climate change.

While the proposed schemes differ in key ways, emissions trading experts said the US plan translated to a cut of up to 31 per cent below 2000 levels.

Andrew Macintosh, associate director of the Australian National University's Centre for Climate Law and Policy, said the US proposal was much more ambitious.

He said it would not be enough to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide to 450 parts per million — the maximum level recommended by climate scientists — but was "about as much as you could expect the US to go for".

"It is certainly well beyond what the Rudd Government is talking about," he said. "It is the sort of thing developed countries have to be talking about if they want to have a decent chance to avoid dangerous climate change."

Climate Institute chief executive John Connor said the US bill was more likely to give momentum to negotiations towards a new global climate agreement, due to be signed in Denmark in December.

"This is a smarter, stronger and more helpful package than the (Australian) Government currently has," he said.

The US proposal, put forward by Democrat Congressman Henry Waxman, would cut emissions to 20 per cent below 2005 levels by 2020 and 83 per cent by mid-century.

But unlike the Australian proposal, its headline target does not include credits for preventing logging in poor countries.

This is listed separately — as a 10 per cent cut below its 2005 emissions.

Also unlike Australia, the US would pay for these deforestation credits, with some of the revenue reaped from auctioning carbon permits to its polluting industries.

The Rudd Government has promised to return all revenue to households and business.

The US bill gives the US President the power to impose carbon tariffs on goods imported from countries that do not take steps to tackle climate change. The draft clean energy and security bill is broadly consistent with US President Barack Obama's emissions targets.

Climate scientists warn that rich countries must cut emissions by 25-40 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020 to avert the worst impacts of climate change.

Few countries have made commitments within this range.

Climate Change Minister Penny Wong, who is travelling in Washington, said: "The debate has a long way to go, but we welcome the release of this draft as a sign that Congress is treating it seriously and urgently."

?New parliamentary secretary for climate change Greg Combet said he was unable to offer additional compensation to industry. He said he would work to best distribute existing compensation measures.


No comments: