Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Palm oil plantations bad for climate: Nature
Monday, January 28, 2013
When will we stop wasting fossil fuels by burning them?
Coal, gas and oil are used to make all sorts of everyday objects, but how we will make those things when fossil fuels run out?
The penny had to drop eventually – fossil fuels like coal might be more valuable if they were used to make medicines, chemicals and fertilisers rather than wasted by being burned.
While we know that fossil fuels are used to make all sorts of everyday objects such as plastics, carbon fibre, soap, aspirins, solvents and dyes, it has never occurred to most of us how we will make these things when the coal, gas and oil run out.
To help concentrate minds on the potential waste of resources, the World Futures Council based in Munich, has attempted for the first timeto put an economic price on burning fossil fuels rather than saving them for more "useful" applications.
The WFC's Matthias Kroll claims the loss of this important natural resource runs into trillions of dollars a year but does not appear in economic calculations of the costs of generating energy. It should particularly be factored into the cost comparisons between renewables and fossil fuels otherwise a false impression is created, he argues.
Kroll's report and his calculations in the rarified field of economics may seem difficult to grasp but he backs them up with figures about the volume of fossil fuels used for industry in a sophisticated economy – in this case, Germany.
Surprisingly, 13.5% of the crude oil in the country is not burned for energy but used to manufacture other products like chemicals. For natural gas it is 4.1% and hard coal 0.7%. Even that small percentage for coal is still 10,318 tonnes.
Although Kroll concedes that Germany, because it is an advanced country, uses a higher proportion of fossil fuels in manufacturing than most, he argues that developing countries will need these resources later for their own industries.
His point is that it is possible to protect the use of increasingly valuable fossil raw materials for the future by substituting these materials with renewables and we should take that into account when working out the full cost of energy production.
On his calculations when we burn fossil fuels rather than save them for more useful purposes we are incurring a loss worldwide of between $8.8bn and $9.3bn dollars a day.
It may be possible to argue with some of the report's findings on costs. For example, sulphur is often extracted from oil before refining and would simply be a waste if not used for fertilisers. On the other hand many of the uses of fossil fuels are the primary reason for taking them out of the ground and as a raw material they already are more valuable than as diesel in the back of a lorry.
There will also be those who say fossil fuel reserves, particularly of coal, are so vast we can use them for whatever purpose we like. It is the same sort of argument that says we should not worry about the effect of climate change on future generations.
• Paul Brown is a journalist at The Climate News Network
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
2012 joined list of hot years, coming in at number 10, US says
The world's combined land and ocean temperature was 1.03 degrees Fahrenheit (0.57 Celsius) above the 20th-century average of 57 degrees, according to NOAA's National Climatic Data Center in Asheville, North Carolina.
"Including 2012, all 12 years to date in the 21st century rank among the 14 warmest in the 133-year period of record," a NOAA statement said. "Only one year in the 20th century -- 1998 -- was warmer than 2012."
Last week, NOAA announced 2012 was the warmest year in the US in records begun in 1895. The nation's warming trend is seen as a reflection of both natural variation and the impact of climate change, according to the climatic center.
A cold snap in December lowered the annual average temperature and moved 2012 from the eighth-warmest to the 10th- warmest, the center said.
The year posted record low sea ice in the Arctic while having record high amounts in the Antarctic.
Arctic sea ice dropped to 1.32 million square miles on September 16, the least seen in the satellite era, which began in 1979. Ten days later at the South Pole, Antarctic sea ice peaked at 7.51 million square miles, which was the most ever recorded.
Bloomberg
Monday, January 14, 2013
Extremes of rain, heat on the way
Sunday, January 13, 2013
Climbing temperatures put health at risk
Friday, January 11, 2013
Off the Charts: Extreme Australian summer heat
Download full report here - http://climatecommission.gov.au/report/off-charts-extreme-january-heat-2013/
Key messages
- The length, extent and severity of the current Australian heatwave is unprecedented in the measurement record.
- Although Australia has always had heatwaves, hot days and bushfires, climate change is increasing the risk of more frequent and longer heatwaves and more extreme hot days, as well as exacerbating bushfire conditions.
- Climate change has contributed to making the current extreme heat conditions and bushfires worse.
- Good community understanding of climate change risks is critical to ensure we take appropriate action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to put measures in place to prepare for, and respond to, extreme weather.
Australia is a land of extremes. As global temperature rises, very hot days are becoming more frequent and heatwaves are becoming more prolonged across many parts of Australia.
The heatwave affecting Australia in late December and early January brought extreme heat to most of the Australian continent over a sustained period. Temperatures above 40°C and 45°C were unprecedented in their extent across the continent, breaking new records for Australian averaged maximum temperatures. The heat was also unprecedented in its duration.
The Climate Commission has received questions from the community and media seeking to understand the link between climate change and the very unusual weather. This document provides a summary of the influence of climate change on Australia's temperature and extreme heat events.
Understanding the link between heat extremes and climate change is important because efforts today to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will influence the severity of these types of events in the future. Having a good understanding of climate change risks can ensure that we take appropriate action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to put measures in place to prepare for, and respond to, more extreme weather.
Author: Climate Commission
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Get used to record-breaking heat: bureau
The Age, January 9, 2013
Those of us who spend our days trawling – and contributing to – the scientific literature on climate change are becoming increasingly gloomy about the future of human civilisation.